Thursday, September 11, 2008


Diagrams in general function as tools for relaying information from one entity to another. They are a means of communication just like writing, radio, television, and speech. However, diagrams can function as learning devices and open visual and spacial areas of understanding in ways that most other types of communication cannot. Many important ideas such as location of objects, chronological order, or processes can be understood by looking at one simple diagram; in writing, these same ideas can take thousands of words to express the same thing to the reader. Therefore, in the context of writing, diagrams can supplement the writer and help him/her to convey the intended message in much fewer words. In the case where the information in a diagram is only a small part of the author's message but still critical to its understanding, the author can spend more time focusing his/her writing on more pertinent and complicated things then the simple but important things easily made understood through diagrams. One ramification of using diagrams in a virtual environment is the lack of reliability. Anyone can post diagrams and information on the internet, the diagram may be meant as a spoof rather than presenting fact. The diagram that I selected functions as a learning device by presenting the names of the parts of dairy cows and the relative location of those parts. The diagram can accomplish this for nearly any audience because it includes an actual image of a cow with the parts clearly labeled. In an audience that has no prior knowledge about the shape or structures of a dairy cow, it would take thousands of words to describe the shape of the parts and their relative location as effectively as the diagram. Now that the diagram has been removed from its original context, it merely shows the parts of a cow. The diagrams original intended purpose was to help the reader understand what area of the cow was being looked at while trying to judge a cow. As a writer, you are responsible for giving credit to the original composer of the diagram you are using. You should let your audience know if you are using it in a factual way or as a spoof. The details of the diagram that are important are the location of the individual parts of a dairy cow. They are labeled with lines pointing to the general location on an image of a cow. To improve understanding, I would have outlined the actual shape of each particular part of the cow to express its actual size and shape rather than only the location.

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Blog Post 1

"But what makes essays last is less their argument than the display of a complex mind and a distinctive prose voice." (Atwan 29)

-Susan Sontag

In Susan Sontag's essay about essays, she writes, "But what makes essays last is less their argument than the display of a complex mind and a distinctive prose voice" (atwan 29).  It is not the topic an author chooses that makes an essay superior and lasting; it is the way the author presents the topic using his/her own unique style.  essays are similar to love.  Everyone has their own inimitable approach to love and their own manner in which they love others.  No type of love is the most accurate, as long as the type is the genuine way that a particular individual loves.  In writing an essay, the imagery, use of figurative language, syntax, and diction that an author employs to convey his thoughts and emotions on a subject is his/her own mind at work, communicating in its own unique method.
In the processes of writing an essay and loving another, the individual literally makes his/her love or his/her essay a reflection of his/herself.  The way compassion is shown, the way tone is exhibited, and the way analogies and voice are presented reveal an individual's distinguishing persona.  When Fifty-Cent loves, he loves "Like a fat kid love cake."  Randy Travis says his love is "Deeper then the holler, stronger than the river, higher the the pine trees growing tall upon the hill, purer than the snowflakes that fall in late December, honest as a robin on a springtime windowsill, and longer than the song of a whippoorwill."  Both types of love are lasting and memorable, but neither have any similarities besides being examples of sincere ways certain individuals love.  Likewise, James Madison's essays on Federalism and Kitty Burns Florey's essay Sister Bernadette's Barking Dog have no organizational pattern or use of language that resembles one another, yet both are lasting because they reveal truth about their author's persona and special voice.
No one can say that Faith Hill's love, "The way you love me, it's a feeling like this, it's centrifugal motion, it's perpetual bliss, it's that pivotal moment, it's ahh... impossible, this kiss, this kiss," is more valid than Michael Bolton's who says that, "When a man loves a woman, can't keep his mind on nothin else, he'd trade the world f0r a good thing he's found."  Both loves are just as lasting and authentic as Susan Sontag's essay where she says, "But what makes essays last is less their argument than the display of a complex mind and a distinctive prose voice," or Susan Orleans essay where she describes essays saying, "What mattered was that they conveyed the writer's journey, and did it intelligently, gracefully, honestly, and with whatever voice or shape fit best" (atwan 29, 24). Love and essays are human minds naked and exposed.

Thursday, August 28, 2008